I would chose the Canon RF 24-240mm lens instead. I feel it performs comparably to this lens in the same focal range, but gives you a little higher performance at the 70-105mm range due to a lower aperture. I also would appreciate the extra 100+mm of zoom it affords. The next question is, how does this stack up to the RF 24-105mm f4 L?
Weight (g) (Including the battery and memory card) (Approx.) *For camera kits, weight includes kit lens(es). 880
Canon RF 24-105mm F4-7.1 IS STM: Image Circle: 35mm (RF-mount) Type: 0.7 - 1.12 ft./ 0.2 - 0.34m • During MF: 0.43 - 1.12 ft./ 0.13 - 0.34m Weight: 395g / 0.87 lbs. Notes: For Canon RF
I was looking for canon 24-105 F4 for canon EOS RP but 24-105 F4 are very expensive.. 2nd option are 24-105(F4~7.1) when i need take pics at 105 focal length,due to 7.1 aperture i may loose many light or didn't get IDEAL BOKEH so what i do..if anybody guide so i will be greatfull. I had the RF 24-105 STM for a year or so.
The Canon RF 24-240mm F4-6.3 IS USM covers a bigger zoom range than any other lens for the system, but it makes some sacrifices to get there. Weight: 1.7 lb Filter Thread: 72 mm Mount: Canon
E38lOWH. n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/700n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/219n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/656n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/564n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/332n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/266n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/905n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/867n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/570n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/771n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/822n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/899n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/478n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/465n9u5kwlleu.pages.dev/354
canon rf 24 105 f4 7.1 weight
